<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fundamentalist Atheist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.abclarke.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.abclarke.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/</link>
	<description>Using transparency and other management techniques to change who I am and what I'm about</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 04:35:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: finch</title>
		<link>http://blog.abclarke.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-1333</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[finch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abclarke.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-1333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[that&#039;s a good one]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s a good one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Clarke</title>
		<link>http://blog.abclarke.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Clarke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 21:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abclarke.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oh, so do I...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, so do I&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blog.abclarke.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 21:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abclarke.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the term &#039;Ambiguous Agnistic&#039;.  Just because you personally do/don&#039;t believe in something dosen&#039;t mean it does/dosen&#039;t exist or didn&#039;t happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the term &#8216;Ambiguous Agnistic&#8217;.  Just because you personally do/don&#8217;t believe in something dosen&#8217;t mean it does/dosen&#8217;t exist or didn&#8217;t happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fadingad</title>
		<link>http://blog.abclarke.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fadingad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 02:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abclarke.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Art-

Thank you so much for commenting on my blog. Love your article. Personally, I’m dogmatically against dogma. But seriously, as a skeptic my whole life, I was constantly turned off to religion- especially growing up gay. But when I started believing in science with the same faith as a religious person, I started to wonder about my own dogma and stopped scoffing at faith.

No one can prove or disprove scientifically the existence of a supreme being, whomever she may be- so why not just open to the endless possibilities. I don’t see the need for a creator in a universe that is so remarkably weird and beautiful and chaotic and ordered at the same time - but I honor others who do have this need - as long as it doesn’t impede on my personal freedoms.

As a child I called myself an atheist but when I met other atheists, they treated it like a religion and that turned me off. Agnostics always had a wishy-washy (flip-flop Presidential candidate) impression. But I am much more comfortable with that label since I don’t have a belief system built around it. The afterlife, ESP, UFOs- all have fallen under my category of the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus while growing up. My current faith in science’s claims of parallel and infinite universes is also tinged with skepticism. Fundamentally, I’m anti-fundamentalist. Sorry. I can’t help joking.

Best,
Frank

http://fadingad.wordpress.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art-</p>
<p>Thank you so much for commenting on my blog. Love your article. Personally, I’m dogmatically against dogma. But seriously, as a skeptic my whole life, I was constantly turned off to religion- especially growing up gay. But when I started believing in science with the same faith as a religious person, I started to wonder about my own dogma and stopped scoffing at faith.</p>
<p>No one can prove or disprove scientifically the existence of a supreme being, whomever she may be- so why not just open to the endless possibilities. I don’t see the need for a creator in a universe that is so remarkably weird and beautiful and chaotic and ordered at the same time &#8211; but I honor others who do have this need &#8211; as long as it doesn’t impede on my personal freedoms.</p>
<p>As a child I called myself an atheist but when I met other atheists, they treated it like a religion and that turned me off. Agnostics always had a wishy-washy (flip-flop Presidential candidate) impression. But I am much more comfortable with that label since I don’t have a belief system built around it. The afterlife, ESP, UFOs- all have fallen under my category of the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus while growing up. My current faith in science’s claims of parallel and infinite universes is also tinged with skepticism. Fundamentally, I’m anti-fundamentalist. Sorry. I can’t help joking.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Frank</p>
<p><a href="http://fadingad.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://fadingad.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Clarke</title>
		<link>http://blog.abclarke.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Clarke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 20:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abclarke.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Brad &amp; writeitoutplease :)
Brad, I agree that there are limits to what science can show us (as there are limits to what spirituality can show us).  it&#039;s really a balance -- it&#039;s just taken me a long time to realize that.

And writeitoutplease, you&#039;re spot on.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brad &amp; writeitoutplease <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Brad, I agree that there are limits to what science can show us (as there are limits to what spirituality can show us).  it&#8217;s really a balance &#8212; it&#8217;s just taken me a long time to realize that.</p>
<p>And writeitoutplease, you&#8217;re spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://blog.abclarke.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 16:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abclarke.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your scientific approach in your blogs is as refreshing as it is uncommon. After reading this blog, I was wondering if the scientific method can actually be considered capable of explaining something as elusive as god or religion. Even if it could, how long would the explanation last considering that science is ever-changing and even things that have been &#039;proven&#039; change over time?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your scientific approach in your blogs is as refreshing as it is uncommon. After reading this blog, I was wondering if the scientific method can actually be considered capable of explaining something as elusive as god or religion. Even if it could, how long would the explanation last considering that science is ever-changing and even things that have been &#8216;proven&#8217; change over time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: writeitoutplease</title>
		<link>http://blog.abclarke.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[writeitoutplease]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 12:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abclarke.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was going to say that rationale and science cannot explain everything, but you&#039;ve said it already. Fundamentalist Atheists and Fundamentalist Christians could learn lots from each other if they didn&#039;t look at human minds as territory to war over (especially Fundamentalist Christians).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to say that rationale and science cannot explain everything, but you&#8217;ve said it already. Fundamentalist Atheists and Fundamentalist Christians could learn lots from each other if they didn&#8217;t look at human minds as territory to war over (especially Fundamentalist Christians).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://blog.abclarke.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lola]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 04:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abclarke.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi nice post, i enjoyed it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi nice post, i enjoyed it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GNP</title>
		<link>http://blog.abclarke.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GNP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 22:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abclarke.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really enjoying this series of posts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really enjoying this series of posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Clarke</title>
		<link>http://blog.abclarke.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Clarke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abclarke.wordpress.com/2007/08/15/the-fundamentalist-atheist/#comment-136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting thought.  I wonder (and I suspect you&#039;re right) if that question does have predictabive qualities for spiritualism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thought.  I wonder (and I suspect you&#8217;re right) if that question does have predictabive qualities for spiritualism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

